Skip to main content

See Corexi on your own product — book a 15-min personalized demo.

Request demo
Corexi

Methodology

Not a black box.
Every score has a source.

Most AI tools give you a number. Corexi gives you the number, the research it comes from, the evidence behind it, and the code to fix it. Here is exactly how we measure product experience.

200+ research sources65% deterministic, 35% AIaxe-core verified11 evaluation categories3 analysis layers

01 — The score

One number. Five dimensions. Weighted.

Your UX Score is a weighted composite of five UX dimensions. Each dimension is derived from 9 core evaluation categories plus 2 neurodiversity layers. The formula is public, not hidden.

Behavioral Health
30%
Visual Quality
20%
Accessibility
20%
Usability
15%
Cognitive Load
15%

Multi-viewport: desktop carries 60%, mobile 40%. Each scan accumulates product context, so scores get sharper over time.

02 — What we measure

9 core categories

Every page scan is evaluated across these categories. Each has measurable criteria rooted in 200+ peer-reviewed sources. Every accessibility finding is cross-checked against axe-core.

01

Visual Hierarchy

Is the most important element the first to catch attention? Are headings differentiated? Is the visual flow logical?

02

CTA Visibility

Can you find the primary action in under 2 seconds? Is contrast above WCAG AA 4.5:1? Is sizing appropriate?

03

Form Design

Are labels present and readable? Are error states designed? Are inputs sized for touch and keyboard?

04

Spacing & Layout

Is white space consistent? Is a grid system present? Are there cramped or scattered areas?

05

Typography

Are fonts readable at 16px+ body? Is line length 45-75 characters? Does weight create hierarchy?

06

Color & Contrast

Does text pass WCAG AA? Is the palette consistent? Is color ever the sole information carrier?

07

Mobile Responsiveness

Are touch targets 44x44px+? Is there horizontal scroll? Is text readable on a phone?

08

Cognitive Load

Can a first-time user understand what to do? Is navigation clear? Is there decision paralysis?

09

Accessibility

Alt text, form labels, keyboard nav, ARIA, focus indicators. Every claim axe-core verified.

03 — Beyond standard UX

+2 neurodiversity categories

WCAG covers compliance. It does not cover whether a neurodivergent user can actually use your product. Corexi scores Color Vision Deficiency and Dyslexia Readability as first-class scan categories. No other automated tool does this.

Color Vision Deficiency

Red/green combinations, color as sole info carrier, problematic color pairs. Scored as a dedicated scan category.

Dyslexia Readability

Line length, letter spacing, justified text, ALL CAPS blocks, contrast below 7:1. Scored as a dedicated scan category.

04 — Real user data

Your analytics + our snippet. One confidence score.

Visual analysis tells you what looks wrong. Behavioral data tells you what actually hurts. Connect your existing analytics — or drop our one-line Corexi Snippet for instant signals without any third-party dependency. The more sources you connect, the sharper the findings.

ProviderWindowSignal
GA47 daysSessions, bounce rate, engagement
Clarity72 hoursRage clicks, dead clicks, quick-backs
Mixpanel7 daysEvent volume, active days
Amplitude7 daysActive users, event cadence
PostHog7 daysEvents, active users (deduped)
FirebaseAuthMobile app analytics
HotjarAuthSurvey and feedback data
Corexi Snippet1 hourScroll depth, rage clicks, dead clicks, time on page

~40%

Visual AI only

~65%

+1 provider

85-95%

+2-3 providers

05 — Verification

Verified, not guessed.

Every accessibility finding is cross-checked against axe-core at runtime. Verified findings carry a badge. LLM-only findings stay flagged. You always know which is which.

Verified finding

AI detected an issue AND axe-core confirmed it against WCAG 2.2 rules. 27 rule IDs checked. This is the standard for compliance claims.

AI-only finding

AI detected a potential issue but no deterministic rule confirmed it. Flagged for human review. Transparent about confidence level.

06 — The layers

Three layers. One score.

Every scan flows through three analysis layers. Each layer adds a different kind of evidence. Together, they produce findings that no single layer could generate alone.

A

Visual layer

Multi-viewport screenshots analyzed by AI vision across all 11 categories. Deterministic checks (contrast ratios, touch targets, spacing) run alongside AI interpretation. This is what you see.

B

Behavioral layer

Real user signals from your connected analytics and the Corexi Snippet — bounce rates, rage clicks, scroll depth, session patterns. This is what your users actually do.

C

Reasoning engine

Cross-validates visual findings with behavioral data. A contrast issue that correlates with high bounce rate scores higher than one with no behavioral signal. The engine gets sharper with every scan.

Visual-only scans work from day one. Adding behavioral sources increases confidence from ~40% to 85%+. The engine never requires all layers — it adapts to what you connect.

07 — Data principles

Privacy-first. Always.

Minimal, opt-in tracking

The Corexi Snippet is optional and cookieless. It collects anonymous behavioral signals only — no PII, no session replay, 24h data retention. Your users see nothing.

Read-only analytics

We connect to your existing providers via read-only API. We pull aggregated metrics only.

No PII, ever

Bounce rates, session depth, engagement patterns. Never individual identities, emails, or browsing histories.

EU-based, GDPR compliant

All processing on EU infrastructure. Credentials encrypted at rest (AES-256). Disconnect and delete any time.

See it in action.

Book a demo and see how the engine works on your own product.